The economic divergence between China and India, despite both countries opening up to the global economy around the same time in the early 1990s, can be attributed to several key factors, with education playing a pivotal role.
One of the most significant differences lies in the paths each country chose for globalization. China focused on becoming the world’s manufacturing hub, starting with the production of toys and electronics and progressing to more complex industries such as electric cars and semiconductors. In contrast, India emphasized the development of service sectors, particularly computer software. This distinction in economic strategies has had profound implications for their growth trajectories.
### Demographic and Educational Differences
China’s demographic profile has been shaped by its one-child policy, which led to a pronounced youth bulge. This demographic shift contributed to China’s rapid economic growth and brought the country to the brink of achieving rich-country status before it began to face the challenges of an aging population. India, on the other hand, is currently experiencing its own demographic transition, but it lacks the sufficient job opportunities to absorb the surplus labor from its agricultural sector.
In terms of education, the historical context is crucial. Despite India having a 50-year head-start in exposure to Western learning, which resulted in a significantly larger student population in the early years, China’s educational system has shown remarkable resilience and adaptability. During the 1950s, China maintained a steady expansion of secondary schooling, even through the tumultuous period of the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), although this period did disrupt undergraduate education.
By the early 1980s, India’s college enrollment ratio was five times higher than China’s. However, by 2020, the situation had reversed: China was sending a much larger proportion of its university-age cohort to tertiary institutions compared to India. This shift is critical because, as a paper by Kevin Murphy, Andrei Shleifer, and Robert Vishny in 1991 highlighted, a country seeking rapid economic expansion needs a higher number of engineers rather than lawyers. China’s emphasis on engineering and vocational education has been a key driver of its manufacturing prowess.
### Impact of Educational Focus
The emphasis on engineering and vocational training in China has enabled the country to develop a robust manufacturing sector. This is evident in China’s sophisticated infrastructure projects, such as its high-speed train network and the advancement in electric vehicles (EVs). In contrast, India’s educational system, despite producing many successful tech industry leaders, including CEOs of major companies like Microsoft and Alphabet, has not translated into the same level of manufacturing competitiveness.
China’s educational achievements can also be attributed to its adult education programs. In 1976, China had 160 million people who had missed out on regular schooling but were enrolled in adult education programs, compared to just 1 million in India. This initiative in literacy and numeracy has had a lasting impact, as the progeny of those educated through these programs have contributed significantly to China’s economic growth.
### Historical and Policy Context
The economic policies and historical residues also play a significant role. Deng Xiaoping’s 1992 tour of southern China marked a significant shift in China’s economic policy, signaling its willingness to engage with Western capital while maintaining the primacy of the Communist Party. Around the same time, India’s then-finance minister Manmohan Singh made a decisive break from Soviet-inspired socialism and isolationism, paving the way for India to become a major economic player.
However, the legacy of British colonial rule in India has left an enduring impact on its educational system. The top-down, elitist bias in India’s education has persisted, contrasting with China’s more inclusive approach to education. This difference has contributed to the varying outcomes in their economic growth.
### Conclusion
In summary, the divergence in economic growth between China and India can be largely attributed to their different approaches to education and economic development. China’s focus on manufacturing, driven by a strong emphasis on engineering and vocational education, combined with its extensive adult education programs, has given it a competitive edge. India, while producing talented individuals in the tech sector, has struggled to match China’s manufacturing capabilities due to its service-oriented economic strategy and the historical biases in its educational system.
[Original Article](https://www.business-standard.com/economy/news/education-the-secret-sauce-that-124110800098_1.html)